Tag: Bill O’Reilly

Posted on

Note to Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer! Stop the impeachment insane waste of our time and money and energy. Read what POTUS Trump said. You have no case. Get on with the inauguration. Focus Nancy. Focus Chuck. Be a stateswoman Nancy. Be a statesman Chuck. Forget this impeachment drivel. Help us be free, safe, and prosperous. Make sure there is enough security and get Joe and Kamala sworn in a few days from now. And send out the $2000 checks.

A Note to Nancy Pelosi. A Note to Chuck Schumer.

  1. Nancy, stop the impeachment insanity now.
  2. Chuck, stop the impeachment insanity now.
  3. Be a stateswoman. Be a statesman.
  4. For 4 years you and half the nation have wasted the time and emotions of the whole nation beating up on POTUS Trump.
  5. Nancy and Chuck, stop wasting our time and money and energy.
  6. Do something positive to help us be free, safe, and prosperous.
  7. Stop blocking the COVID payments.
  8. President Trump addressed supporters near the White House on January 6th 2021.
  9. FACT CHECK, NANCY.
  10. FACT CHECK, CHUCK.
  11. Did POTUS Trump advocate or encourage violence?
  12. Did POTUS Trump encourage anyone to enter the Capitol building?
  13. No he did not Nancy.
  14. Not one whit.
  15. You can read.
  16. Have you taken the time to read what he said?
  17. You have no case.
  18. Those who entered the capitol deserve to be found and prosecuted, to be sure.
  19. Likewise, those who rioted and looted in the past deserve to be found and prosecuted as well.
  20. Violence and trespass are not to be condoned in any fashion.
  21. Our nation functions because we are a nation of LAW and ORDER.
  22. POTUS Trump is home free on this one.
  23. He told his supporters to go home.
  24. He stands firm and has always stood firm against violence.
  25. POTUS Trump’s speech includes no calls or encouragement whatsoever for anyone to trespass and enter the Capitol.
  26. POTUS Trump’s speech includes no calls or encouragement whatsoever for anyone to use violence.
  27. In fact, indication is that those who entered were coordinating with inside persons and already entering the Capitol during POTUS Trump’s speech.
  28. Read what he said.
  29. To the contrary, POTUS Trump says states want to revote now that they have seen the voter fraud.
  30. He contrasts his peaceful followers with those who were lawless and earlier rioted and burned and looted in our cities.
  31. He says there would be hell to pay if what happened to him happened to democrats.
  32. He asks those who support him to fight by using the primary and by voting those who did not help us be free, safe, and prosper out of office.
  33. Here are POTUS Trump’s words. Read them, Nancy. Read them Chuck.
  34. And then stop this impeachment insanity immediately.
  35. And FOCUS.
  36. Get enough security and get Joe and Kamala installed.
  37. The following are POTUS TRUMP’S WORDS:
  38. Media will not show the magnitude of this crowd.
  39. Even I, when I turned on today, I looked, and I saw thousands of people here, but you don’t see hundreds of thousands of people behind you because they don’t want to show that.
  40. We have hundreds of thousands of people here, and I just want them to be recognized by the fake news media. 
  41. Turn your cameras, please, and show what is really happening out here, because these people are not going to take it any longer, they’re not going to take it any longer.
  42. Go ahead, turn your cameras, please.
  43. Would you show they came from all over the world actually, but they came from all over our country.
  44. I just really want to see what they do.
  45. I just want to see how they cover it.
  46. I’ve never seen anything like it, but it would be really great if we could be covered fairly by the media.
  47. The media is the biggest problem we have as far as I’m concerned, single biggest problem.
  48. The fake news and the big tech, big tech, is now coming into their own.
  49. We beat them four years ago, we surprised them.
  50. We took him by surprise and this year they rigged an election, they rigged it like they have never rigged an election before, and by the way, last night, they didn’t do a bad job either, if you notice.
  51. I am honest, and I just again, I want to thank you.
  52. It’s just a great honor to have this kind of crowd and to be before you and hundreds of thousands of American patriots who are committed to the honesty of our elections and the integrity of our glorious Republic.
  53. All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by bold and radical left Democrats, which is what they are doing, and stolen by the fake news media.
  54. That is what they have done and what they are doing.
  55. We will never give up.
  56. We will never concede.
  57. It doesn’t happen.
  58. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.
  59. Our country has had enough. 
  60. We will not take it anymore, and that is what this is all about.
  61. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with, we will stop the steal.
  62. Today I will lay out just some of the evidence proving that we won this election and we won it by a landslide.
  63. This was not a close election.
  64. You know I say sometimes jokingly, but there’s no joke about it.
  65. I have been in two elections.
  66. I won them both and the second one I won much bigger than the first, okay?
  67. Almost 75 million people voted for our campaign, the most of any incumbent president by far in the history of our country; 12 million more than four years ago.
  68. And I was told by the real pollsters; we do have real pollsters.
  69. They know that we were going to do well and we were going to win.
  70. What I was told, if I went from 63 million, which we had four years ago, to 66 million, there was no chance of losing.
  71. Well, we didn’t go to 66, we went to 75 million, and they say we lost.
  72. We didn’t lose.
  73. And by the way, does anybody believe that Joe had 80 million votes?
  74. Does anybody believe that?
  75. He had 80 million computer votes.
  76. It’s a disgrace.
  77. There’s never been anything like that.
  78. You can take Third World countries, just take a look, take Third World countries, their elections are more honest than what we have been going through in this country.
  79. It’s a disgrace.
  80. It’s a disgrace.
  81. Even when you look at last night, they were all running around like chickens with their heads cut off with boxes, and nobody knows what the hell is going on.
  82. There’s never been anything like this.
  83. We will not let them silence your voices.
  84. We’re not going to let it happen.
  85. Not going to let it happen.
  86. Thank you.
  87. And I would love to have, if those tens of thousands of people would be allowed, the military, the Secret Service and we want to thank you — and the police and law enforcement — great, you’re doing a great job.
  88. But I would love it if they could be allowed to come up with us. Is that possible?
  89. Can you just let them, please?
  90. And Rudy [Giuliani], you did a great job.
  91. He’s got guts.
  92. You know what?
  93. He’s got guts, unlike a lot of people in the Republican Party, he’s got guts, he fights, he fights.
  94. [How did Rudy fight? He filed lawsuits and addressed legislatures and the public.]
  95. And I will tell you thank you very much, John [Eastman], fantastic job. I watched — that’s a tough act to follow those two.
  96. John is one of the most brilliant lawyers in the country and he looked at this, and he said what an absolute disgrace that this could be happening to our Constitution, and he looked at Mike Pence, and I hope Mike is going to do the right thing.
  97. I hope so.
  98. I hope so because if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election.
  99. All he has to do — all — this is — this is from the number one or certainly one of the top constitutional lawyers in our country.
  100. He has the absolute right to do it.
  101. We’re supposed to protect our country, support our country, support our Constitution and protect our Constitution.
  102. States want to revote, the states got defrauded.
  103. They were given false information, they voted on it.
  104. Now they want to recertify; they want it back.
  105. All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become president, and you are the happiest people.
  106. And I actually, I just spoke to Mike. 
  107. I said, Mike, that doesn’t take courage, what takes courage is to do nothing.
  108. That takes courage, and then we are stuck with a president who lost the election by a lot, and we have to live with that for four more years.
  109. We’re just not going to let that happen.
  110. Many of you have traveled from all across the nation to be here, and I want to thank you for the extraordinary love.
  111. That is what it is; there’s never been a movement like this ever, ever for the extraordinary love for this amazing country.
  112. And this amazing movement.
  113. Thank you.
  114. By the way, this goes all the way back past the Washington Monument.
  115. Do you believe this? Look at this.
  116. Unfortunately, they gave the press the prime seats.
  117. I can’t stand that.
  118. No, but you look at that behind.
  119. I wish they would flip those cameras and look behind you.
  120. That is the most amazing site.
  121. When they make a mistake, you get to see it on television, amazing. Amazing.
  122. All of the way back and don’t worry.
  123. We will not take the name off the Washington Monument.
  124. We will not.
  125. Cancel culture.
  126. They wanted to get rid of the Jefferson Memorial, either take it down or just put somebody else in there.
  127. I don’t think that’s going to happen.
  128. It damn well better not, even though with this administration if this happens, it could happen.
  129. You will see some really bad things happen.
  130. They will knock out Lincoln, too, by the way.
  131. They have been taking his statute down, but then we signed a little law, you hurt our monuments, you hurt our heroes, you go to jail for 10 years, and everything stopped.
  132. You notice that it stopped?
  133. It all stopped, and they could use Rudy back in New York City, Rudy.
  134. They could use you.
  135. Your city is going to hell.
  136. They want Rudy Giuliani back in New York.
  137. We will get a little younger version of Rudy.
  138. Is that okay, Rudy?
  139. We’re gathered together in the heart of our nation’s capital for one very, very basic and simple reason, to save our democracy.
  140. You know most candidates on election evening, and of course, this thing goes on so long they still don’t have any idea what the votes are.
  141. We still have congressional seats under review.
  142. They have no idea.
  143. They have totally lost control;
  144. they have used the pandemic as a way of defrauding the people in a proper election,
  145. but you know, you know when you see this and when you see what is happening, number one they all say, sir, we will never let it happen again. I said that’s good, but what about eight weeks ago?
  146. You know they try and get you to go, they say, sir, in four years you are guaranteed.
  147. I said, I’m not interested right now.
  148. Do me a favor. Go back eight weeks.
  149. I want to go back eight weeks.
  150. Let’s go back eight weeks.
  151. We want to go back, and we want to get this right, because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there, and our country will be destroyed. And we’re not going to stand for that.
  152. For years, Democrats have gotten away with election fraud and weak Republicans.
  153. And that’s what they are.
  154. There’s so many weak Republicans.
  155. And we have great ones.
  156. Jim Jordan and some of these guys, they are out there fighting.
  157. The House guys are fighting, but it’s — it’s incredible.
  158. Many of the Republicans, I helped them get in.
  159. I helped them get elected.
  160. I helped Mitch get elected. I helped —
  161. I could name 24 of them, let’s say. I won’t bore you with it.
  162. And then all of a sudden, you have something like this.
  163. There is like oh, gee, maybe I’ll talk to the president sometime later.
  164. No, it’s amazing.
  165. The weak Republicans.
  166. They’re pathetic Republicans, and that’s what happens.
  167. If this happened to the Democrats, there’d be hell all over the country going on.
  168. There’d be hell all over the country. 
  169. But just remember this, you’re stronger, you’re smarter.
  170. You’ve got more going than anybody, and they try and demean everybody having to do with us, and you’re the real people.
  171. You’re the people that built this nation.
  172. You’re not the people that tore down our nation.
  173. The weak Republicans — and that’s it, I really believe it.
  174. I think I’m going to use the term.
  175. The weak Republicans.
  176. You’ve got a lot of them and you’ve got a lot of great ones.
  177. But you’ve got a lot of weak ones.
  178. They’ve turned a blind eye.
  179. Even as Democrats enacted policies that
  180. shipped away our jobs,
  181. weakened our military,
  182. threw open our borders,
  183. and put America last.
  184. Did you see the other day where Joe Biden said I want to get rid of the America-first policy.
  185.  What’s that all about?
  186. Get rid of — how do you say I want to get rid of America first?
  187. Even if you’re going to do it, don’t talk about it, right?
  188. Unbelievable, what we have to go through.
  189. What we have to go through — and you have to get your people to fight.
  190. And if they don’t fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don’t fight. We primary them.
  191. We’re going to — we’re going to let you know who they are.
  192. I can already tell you, frankly.
  193. But this year, using the pretext of the China virus and the scam of mail-in ballots, Democrats attempted the most brazen and outrageous election theft.
  194. And there’s never been anything like this.
  195. It’s a pure theft in American history.
  196. Everybody knows it.
  197. That election, our election was over at 10 in the evening.
  198. We’re leading Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia.
  199. By hundreds of thousands of votes, and then late in the evening or early in the morning, boom. 
  200. These explosions of bullshit, and all of the sudden —all of a sudden, it started to happen.
  201. Don’t forget, when Romney got beat — Romney. Did you see his —
  202. I wonder if he enjoyed his flight in last night.
  203. But when Romney got beat, you know, he stands up like your more typical — well, I’d like to congratulate the victor.
  204. The victor.
  205. Who was the victor, Mitt?
  206. I’d like to congratulate.
  207. They don’t go in and look at the facts.
  208. Oh, I don’t know. You’ve got — he got slaughtered, probably.
  209. Maybe it was okay, maybe it was — that’s what happened.

Nancy and Chuck, stop the impeachment insane waste of our time and money and energy. You have no case. You are trying to manufacture a case when there isn’t one. Get on with the inauguration. Focus Nancy. Be a stateswoman. Focus Chuck. Be a statesman. Make sure there is enough security and get Joe and Kamala sworn in a few days from now.

Posted on

Looks like Joe Biden is political toast because Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the democrats are still playing in the third rate minor leagues and have been hit with the boomerang and have stepped in it again and have egg on their faces to use multiple metaphors. BARREL & PORK.


Looks like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the democrats are still playing in the minor leagues and have boomerang stepped in it again and have egg on their faces, PORK. Only this time, POTUS TRUMP played for keeps. There is “no collusion” and “no obstruction” and “no corruption” and he is vindicated once again and Joe Biden is political toast and Warren will be the nominee. It’s a done deal.

How so, BARREL? Sounds like Nancy Pelosi is working for POTUS Trump.

She is, PORK. Instead of having her ducks in a row they are all drowning.

Senate Democrats sent a letter to Ukraine in May of 2018 leaning on Ukraine to investigate POTUS TRUMP. Read this at https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/09/25/dems-sent-letter-to-ukraine-asking-for-investigation-to-trump-n2553705

Hypocrites: Senate Dems Sent Letter Pressuring Ukraine To Investigate Trump In May 2018
  1. “If you have not learned by now, … every Conservative “scandal” in recent memory has been nothing more than leftists projecting their own personal problems onto their political opponents.
  2. “Sexism and abuse against women? Meet Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein.
  3. “Racism? Meet the blackface donning Gov. Ralph Northam and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
  4. [Collusion with the Russians? Meet Hillary Clinton and her cronies and collaborators.]
  5. [Obstruction of Justice? Meet Hillary and Comey and their cronies and collaborators.]
  6. “Trump pressuring Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election? Meet the Democrats in May 2018.
  7. “Yes, the very same Democrats who are now supposedly aghast that President Trump asked the president of Ukraine to look into Joe Biden’s family corruption [wherein Joe and Hunter banked $1.5 billion], 
  8. “[yes, the very same Democrats] actually sent Ukraine a letter saying “U.S. assistance” was at stake unless the Ukrainian government complied with the bogus special counsel Robert Mueller investigation and conducted their own investigation into the president and his former aid Paul Manafort.
  9. “Marc Theissen of the Washington Post brought this up yesterday, and after seeing what the president actually said to his call to the newly elected president Volodymyr Zelensky, it looks like the Democrats have nothing but egg on their face [AGAIN]. 

8. “Here’s what Theissen reported Tuesday: 

9. “It got almost no attention, but in May, CNN reported that Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) wrote a letter to Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Yuriy Lutsenko, expressing concern at the closing of four investigations they said were critical to the Mueller probe.

10. “In the letter, they implied that their support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine was at stake.

11. “Describing themselves as “strong advocates for a robust and close relationship with Ukraine,” the Democratic senators declared, “We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump,” before demanding Lutsenko “reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation.”

12. “So, it’s okay for Democratic senators to encourage Ukraine to investigate Trump, but it’s [hypocritically] not okay for the president to allegedly encourage Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden?

13. ” … The letter clearly shows they were threatening to withhold assistance unless the Ukrainian government did as they demanded. Between this uncovered letter and former Vice President Joe Biden bragging about intimidating the Ukrainian prosecutor, this whole thing is boomeranging on the Dems. Here comes Trump 2020, folks, steamrolling into the White House (again). 

14. As well, “Recommended BREAKING: President Trump’s Ukraine Call Transcript Has Been Released and Blows Up the Latest Impeachment Narrative Katie Pavlich

15. “Steve Guest✔@SteveGuest [Steve gets credit for a great note.]

16. “FLASHBACK to 2018 byYouTubing Joe Biden bragged about bribing Ukraine with $1 BILLION to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his son, Hunter Biden’s company.

If that’s not corruption, I don’t know what is, PORK.

Spot on, BARREL. Spot on.

Posted on

AG Barr and Mr. Huber WHO IF ANY are the accessories? BARREL & PORK.

A. BARREL, is AG Barr or Mr. Huber or someone else in the FBI, DOJ, Inspector General, or media taking the time to ask the question “Are there accessories to the various crimes that appear to have been committed against the nation and against POTUS Trump?


B. PORK, what do you mean?


C. Well, BARREL, if you read Peter Sweizer’s investigative journalism and listen to Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly and Tucker Carlson and Rush Limbaugh and others, it looks to me like some of the politicians and media owners and journalists and company owners have committed serious crimes and others are accessories to those crimes? 


Here are only a few questions: when did 

– Chuck Schumer and or 

– Nancy Pelosi and or 

– Paul Ryan and or 

– Mitch McConnell and or 

– Peter Strok and or 

– Lisa Page and or 

– Brennan or 

– McCabe or 

– Comey or 

– Lynch or 

– Rice or 

– Hillary or 

– Brazile or 

– Wasserman-Schultz or 

– Podestas or 

– then POTUS Obama or 

– Biden or 

– Holder or 

– Bill or 

– CNN or 

– MSNBC or 

– the New York Times or 

– Washington Post or 

– any of the media personalities 

– and media owners and management and outlets or 

– any of the Senators or 

– any from the House know about:


– the Russian collusion fake narrative and

– the fake dossier and 

– the FISA warrant scam and 

– Uranium One and 

– all the Pay to Play money from foreign countries and 

– Pay to Play money from Chinese and Russian corporations and 

– Email-gate and

– Tech transfers to the Chinese and Russians and

– A billion in cash to the Caliphate, and

– Conspiracy to marginalize a duly elected POTUS?

In other words, did one or more of these folks either know and fail to step forward, or aid and abet, or actually participate, and in the process, and did they enrich themselves at the public trough? 

1.    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)#Relative_severity_of_penalties:

2.    BARREL, an accessory is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal.

3.    The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree:

4.    The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevant mens rea (Latinfor “guilty mind”), are the most immediate cause of the actus reus(Latin for “guilty act”).

5.    If two or more people are directly responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as joint principals (see common purpose).

6.    The test to distinguish a joint principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalised and/or limited help and encouragement.

7.    Contents

8.    Elements

8.1.                    1.1Relative severity of penalties

8.2.                    1.2Conspiracy

8.3.                    1.3Criminal facilitation

8.4.                    1.4Knowledge of the crime

8.5.                    1.5Exceptions

9.    2Usage

10.           3History

11.           4Specific laws

11.1.               4.6United States

12.           5See also

13.           6Notes and references

14.           Elements

15.           In some jurisdictions, an accessory is distinguished from an accomplice, who normally is present at the crime and participates in some way.

16.           An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being committed, will be committed, or has been committed.

17.           A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way.

18.           The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.

19.           Relative severity of penalties

20.           The punishment … for accessories varies in different jurisdictions, and has varied at different periods of history.

21.           In some times and places accessories have been subject to lesser penalties than principals (the persons who actually commit the crime).

22.           In others accessories are considered the same as principals in theory, although in a particular case an accessory may be treated less severely than a principal.

23.           In some times and places accessories before the fact (i.e., with knowledge of the crime before it is committed) have been treated differently from accessories after the fact (e.g., those who aid a principal after a crime has been committed, but had no role in the crime itself). 

24.           Common law traditionally considers an accessory just as guilty as the principal(s) in a crime, and subject to the same penalties.

25.            Separate and lesser punishments exist by statute in many jurisdictions.

26.           Conspiracy

27.           In some situations, a charge of conspiracy can be made even if the primary offense is never committed, so long as the plan has been made, and at least one overt act towards the crime has been committed by at least one of the conspirators.

28.           For example, if a group plans on forging bank checks, and forges the checks but ultimately does not attempt to cash the checks, the group might still be charged with conspiracy due to the overt act of forgery.

29.           Thus, an accessory before the fact will often, but not always, also be considered a conspirator.

30.           A conspirator must have been a party to the planning of the crime, rather than merely becoming aware of the plan to commit it and then helping in some way.

31.           A person who incites another to a crime will become a part of a conspiracy if agreement is reached, and may then be considered an accessory or a joint principal if the crime is eventually committed.

32.           In the United States, a person who learns of the crime and gives some form of assistance before the crime is committed is known as an “accessory before the fact”.

33.           A person who learns of the crime after it is committed and helps the criminal to conceal it, or aids the criminal in escaping, or simply fails to report the crime, is known as an “accessory after the fact”.

34.           A person who does both is sometimes referred to as an “accessory before and after the fact”, but this usage is less common.

35.           Criminal facilitation

36.           In some jurisdictions, criminal “facilitation” laws do not require that the primary crime be actually committed as a prerequisite for criminal liability.

37.           These include state statutes making it a crime to “provide” a person with “means or opportunity” to commit a crime, “believing it probable that he is rendering aid to a person who intends to commit a crime.”[1]

38.           Knowledge of the crime

39.           To be convicted of an accessory charge, the accused must generally be proved to have had actual knowledge that a crime was going to be, or had been, committed.

40.           Furthermore, there must be proof that the accessory knew that his or her action, or inaction, was helping the criminals commit the crime, or evade detection, or escape.

41.           A person who unknowingly houses a person who has just committed a crime, for instance, may not be charged with an accessory offense because they did not have knowledge of the crime.

42.           Usage

43.           The term “accessory” derives from the English common law, and been inherited by those countries with a more or less Anglo-American legal system. The concept of complicity is, of course, common across different legal traditions. The specific terms accessory-before-the-fact and accessory-after-the-fact were used in England and the United States but are now more common in historical than in current usage.

44.           United States

45.           U.S. jurisdictions (that is, the federal government and the various state governments) have come to treat accessories before the fact differently from accessories after the fact.

46.           All U.S. jurisdictions have effectively eliminated the distinction between accessories before the fact and principals, either by doing away with the category of “accessory before the fact” entirely or by providing that accessories before the fact are guilty of the same offense as principals.

47.           The Model Penal Code’s definition of accomplice liability includes those who at common law were called accessories before the fact; under the Model Penal Code, accomplices face the same liability as principals.

48.           It is now possible to be convicted as an accessory before the fact even though the principal has not been convicted or (in most jurisdictions) even if the principal was acquitted at an earlier trial.[2]

53.           However, modern U.S. jurisdictions punish accessories after the fact for a separate criminal offense distinct from the underlying crime and having a different (and less severe) punishment.

54.           Some states still use the term “accessory after the fact”; others no longer use the term, but have comparable laws against hindering apprehension or prosecution, obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence, harboring a felon, or the like.

55.           Such crimes usually require proving

56.           (1) an intent to hinder apprehension or prosecution and

57.           (2) actual aid in the form of either

58.           (a) harboring the criminal,

59.           (b) providing specified means (such as a disguise) to evade arrest,

60.           (c) tampering with evidence,

61.           (d) warning the criminal of impending arrest, or

62.           (e) using force or deception to prevent the arrest.[3]

63.           Federal law has followed both these trends.

64.           The U.S. Code effectively treats as principals those who would traditionally have been considered accessories before the fact at common law:[4]

65.           Whoever

66.           aids,

67.           abets,

68.           counsels,

69.           commands,

70.           induces or

71.           procures

72.           the commission of an offense,

73.           is punishable as a principal.

74.           Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense, is punishable as a principal.

75.           However, federal law treats accessories after the fact differently from principals.

76.           Accessories after the fact face a maximum of only half the fine and half the prison time that principals face.

77.           (If the principal faces the death penalty or life imprisonment, accessories after the fact face up to 15 years’ imprisonment.)

78.           Federal law defines accessories after the fact as persons who provide criminals with certain aid in order to hinder a criminal’s apprehension or prosecution:[5]

79.           Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed,

80.           receives,

81.           relieves,

82.           comforts or

83.           assists the offender

84.           in order to

85.           hinder or

86.           prevent

87.           his apprehension,

88.           trial or

89.           punishment,

90.           is an accessory after the fact.

So Mr. Barr and Mr. Huber, here are only a few questions: 

When did 

– Chuck Schumer and or 

– Nancy Pelosi and or 

– Paul Ryan and or 

– Mitch McConnell and or 

– Peter Strok and or 

– Lisa Page and or 

– Brennan or 

– McCabe or 

– Comey or 

– Lynch or 

– Rice or 

– Hillary or 

– Brazile or 

– Wasserman-Schultz or 

– Podestas or 

– then POTUS Obama or 

– Biden or 

– Holder or 

– Bill or 

– CNN or 

– MSNBC or 

– the New York Times or 

– Washington Post or 

– any of the media personalities 

– and media owners and management and outlets or 

– any of the Senators or 

– any from the House know about:


– the Russian collusion fake narrative and

– the fake dossier and 

– the FISA warrant scam and 

– Uranium One and 

– all the Pay to Play money from foreign countries and 

– Pay to Play money from Chinese and Russian corporations and 

– Email-gate and

– Tech transfers to the Chinese and Russians and

– A billion in cash to the Caliphate, and

– Conspiracy to marginalize a duly elected POTUS?

In other words, did one or more of these folks either know and fail to step forward, or aid and abet, or actually participate, and in the process did they misuse their offices and enrich themselves at the public trough?