Month: May 2019

Posted on

Alabama legislatures make abortion a felony. BARREL & PORK.

1. So, BARREL, what do you think of Alabama’s near total ban on abortion – the only exception being for the health of the mother – no exception even for rape or incest?  https://www.al.com/news/de8b00-alabama-abortion-bill.html

2. PORK, I agree with Alabama legislators with this exception. I read the article and the press release used in the article uses the word “millions” which is an egregious generalization.

3. Let’s be specific. 

4. Since Roe v. Wade in 1973, more than 300,000,000+ babies have been surgically and chemically butchered, killed, murdered, maimed, ripped apart, sold for body parts, used in experiments, flushed, dissolved chemically, wiped out forever.

5. 50,000,000+ were Black babies.

6. 50,000,000+ were Hispanic babies.

7. 200,000,000+ were Native American, Jewish American, Asian American, and Caucasian babies.

8. These surgical and chemical “killing field” numbers come from the Planned Parenthood Guttmacher Institute website “numbers of abortions.” http://www.numberofabortions.com/

NOTE THE FOOTNOTE IN THAT WEBSITE WHEREIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD DOCUMENTS 250,000,000 CHEMICAL ABORTIONS. ADD THAT TO THE NOW 61,000,000 SURGICAL ABORTIONS AND YOU HAVE 300,000,000+.

Think about this, PORK. Since Roe v Wade in 1973 – that is 46 years divided into 300,000,000 – we have witnessed more than 6,500,000 killings per year just in the United States alone. 

9. The “Press release from Sen. Clyde Chambliss reads: “Roe v. Wade has ended the lives of millions of children. 
10. “While we cannot undo the damage that decades of legal precedence under Roe have caused, this bill has the opportunity to save the lives of millions of unborn children,” said Senator Clyde Chambliss (R-Prattville), who sponsored HB314 in the Senate. 
11. “Life and liberty are not man given; they are given by our Creator. 
12. “Today, Alabama made clear that we will protect our rights and the rights of our unborn children.” 
13. “In 1973, unelected judges on the Supreme Court cut short the vigorous national debate over abortion, and imposed a top-down, abortion-on-demand agenda on the entire country. 
14. Advances in science since 1973, particularly in ultrasound technology, shows what we know intuitively – a baby in the womb is a person,” Chambliss continued.
15. The article further states:
16. “After several hours of contentious debate, the Alabama Senate on Tuesday night voted 25 – 6 to pass what many say will be the strictest abortion ban in the nation. 
17. “The bill makes abortion a felony in Alabama.
18. “A similar measure already passed the Republican-controlled House but controversy erupted last week in the Senate after an attempt to add amendments that would allow exceptions for victims of rape or incest.
19. “Another attempt to add rape and incest exceptions on Tuesday also failed and led to a filibuster attempt.
20. “Proponents of the measure pushed for a “clean bill” without amendments in order to clear the way to a legal fight in the U.S. Supreme Court and a review of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion.
21. “The bill now goes to Gov. Kay Ivey, who will decide whether to sign it into law.
22. “Complete coverage of the abortion debate can be found here [at this link]: https://topics.al.com/tag/abortion/index.html
https://topics.al.com/tag/abortion/index.html

Posted on

Looks like Mr. Nadler and those colluding with him have obstructed justice. BARREL & PORK.

1. So, BARREL, you are a litigator of civil and criminal matters, is it not much more reasonable to conclude from Mr. Nadler’s conduct that Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him are the ones who are criminally colluding and obstructing justice?

2. PORK, yes it is. AG BARR and the DOJ may wish to take Mr. Nadler’s conduct and that of those who are colluding with him to the Grand Jury.

4. How so, BARREL?

5. PORK, the general legal definition of obstruction of justice is straight forward.

6. Obstruction of Justice is:

7. a crime defined as

8. the act of willfully interfering with the  process of justice and law

9. especially

10. threatening

11. harming

12. impeding a witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer

13. or by furnishing false information in

14. or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process .

15. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him by their conduct in attacking AG BARR have willfully interfered with the special counsel and AG/Department Of Justice process of justice and law.

17. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have threatened AG BARR and the Department of Justice on national television and before congress.

18. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have threatened POTUS TRUMP on national television and before congress.

19. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have harmed AG BARR’s  reputation on national television and before congress.

20. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have harmed POTUS TRUMP’S reputation on national television and before congress.

21. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have impeded the conclusion of the Mueller investigation wherein MR. MUELLER found no collusion and no obstruction and AG BARR and DAG ROSENSTEIN found no collusion and no obstruction.

22. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have impeded the legal process which exonerates POTUS TRUMP.

23. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have also impeded the on-going legal process of ferreting out and indicting those who foisted the Russia collusion narrative off on the country for the last two years, and those who got egregiously rich violating their office trust, and those who committed election law violations, not the least of which was marginalizing Mr. Sanders in 2016.

24. More specifically

25. Definition

18 U.S.C. § 1503 18. U.S.C. Section 1503 defines “obstruction of justice” as an act that “corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice.”

26. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him have “corruptly and by threats of force and by threatening communication influenced, obstructed, impeded, and endeavored to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice” which is to exonerate POTUS TRUMP.

27. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him are obstructing justice in that they have “a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding – in this case the Mueller investigation conclusion in favor of POTUS TRUMP. 

28. Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him may be indicted for obstructing justice, because Mr. Nadler and his cronies “not only have the specific intent to obstruct the [Mueller investigation] [and obstruct the work of AG BARR and the Department of Justice] proceedings [which exonerates POTUS TRUMP][and find and indict those who are guilty of riling up the nation with the false narratives of POTUS TRUMP Russia Collusion and guilty of profiting off their offices and guilty of egregious election violations including marginalizing Mr. Sanders during the 2016 election], and Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him “know (1) that a proceeding [the Mueller investigation][and multiple criminal investigations] are “actually pending at the time; and (2) there [is] a connection between Mr. Nadler’s (and those who are colluding with him) endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding[s mentioned], and” Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him “have knowledge of this connection.

§ 1503 applies … to federal judicial proceedings. 

29. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him “can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing … pending proceeding[s] before Congress or a federal administrative agency [in this case the DOJ and Federal Courts]. A pending proceeding … include[s] an informal investigation by an executive agency [as well].

30. So, PORK, it looks like Mr. Nadler and those who are colluding with him are once again using the age old Saul Allinsky tactic of accusing AG BARR and POTUS TRUMP of doing what they are doing.

31. Again, AG BARR may want to take the collusion and obstructionist conduct of Mr. Nadler and those colluding with him to a Grand Jury. 

Posted on

Contempt of Congress for AG BARR? No. Contempt for Democrats? Yes. BARREL & PORK

1. BARREL, I read this today.

2. ‘Bill Barr is following the law and what’s his reward? Democrats hold him in contempt,’ Jordan said. 

3. ‘I don’t think today’s actually about getting information. 

4. I don’t think it’s about getting the un-redacted Mueller report.’ 

5. ‘I think it’s all about trying to destroy Bill Barr because Democrats are nervous he’s going to get to the bottom of everything. 

6. He’s going to find out how and why this investigation started in the first place,’ he added. 

7. See Contempt?

8. PORK, this statement is false on its face. The facts are these. Bill Barr is not “going to get to the bottom of everything.”

9. Bill Barr already has gotten “to the bottom of everything.”

10. He already knows why this investigation of POTUS TRUMP started in the first place.

11. He already has the evidence and knows Hillary Clinton’s and Barak Obama’s role.

12. He already has the evidence and knows Bill Clinton’s role.

13. He already has the evidence and knows James Comey’s role.

14. He already has the evidence and knows John Podesta’s role.

15. He already has the evidence and knows the role of Brennan, McCabe, Strok, Page, and others including those in the media who knowingly foisted off the false TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION NARRATIVE on us the American people..

16. He already has the evidence and knows the role of Biden in the fake FISA warrants and the role of Biden in helping his son take a billion dollars from the Chinese.

17. He already has the evidence and knows the DNC’s role and the role of the DNC’s public relations and advertising and legal firms.

18. He already has the evidence and knows the role of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

19. He already has the evidence and knows the role of the other bad actors who also knew the TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION NARRATIVE was false.

20. AG BARR already knows what is “at the bottom of everything.”

21. Odds are the indictments are written and ready to be issued.

22. The democrats have done NOTHING to help us be FREE, SAFE, or PROSPEROUS since POTUS TRUMP was elected.

23. All they have done is criticize and block POTUS TRUMP with this FALSE TRUMP RUSSIA NARRATIVEa knowing it was a lie concocted to take out a sitting president.

24. While the democrats have done NOTHING, all the while POTUS TRUMP has accomplished more than 300 of his promises to us the American people — promises to help us be FREE, SAFE, and PROSPEROUS.